Somewhere along the road of my editing instruction, I was under the impression that because indicated causality, since indicated x happened and y happened because of x, and as was a weak causal word or indicated simultaneous events. I edited accordingly. But lo and behold, in researching for this very blog post, I realized that this rule I was so strictly abiding by was not upheld by Chicago:
since.
This word may relate either to time {since last winter}
or to causation {since I’m a golfer, I know what “double
bogey” means}. Some writers erroneously believe that the word relates
exclusively to time. But the causal since was a part of the English
language before Chaucer wrote in the fourteenth century, and it is useful as a
slightly milder way of expressing causation than because. But where
there is any possibility of confusion with the temporal sense, use because. (5.220)
A little earlier, because, as, and since are all accepted as subordinating conjunctions that indicate causality or reason (5.201). So I stand corrected, although I certainly still have my preferences. Here are some sentences that came up recently that rubbed me the wrong way.
Margaret had been thrilled by these books since they all
seemed so new compared to everything the library had.
This sentence initially prompted me to doubt the "rule" I thought I had learned. I still don't like since there.
He has forbidden me to go inside since Henry started
working there.
Ambiguous. It could mean she was forbidden when he started working there or for the reason that he is is working there. If the latter, then only because is appropriate.
Soon there was no point in washing anymore as she’d just be rearranging the
dirt.
All the noisy rancor suddenly died away as no one
could see anything and no one wanted to move.
Both of the above could have because instead of as, and that's how I would prefer it, but to each his own.
Over and out.
No comments:
Post a Comment